Justice in the Delivery of Government Services [United States]: Decision Norms of Street-Level Bureaucrats in Select Southwest and Midwest U.S. Cities, 1996-1999
- Maynard-Moody, Steven (University of Kansas. Policy Research Institute and Department of Public Administration)
- Musheno, Michael (Arizona State University. School for Justice Studies)
- Version 1 (Subtitle)
- National Science Foundation
AbstractThis study examined the various factors involved in the decision norms of street-level bureaucrats. The principal investigators explored how police officers, school teachers, and vocational rehabilitation counselors decided what was fair and right in individual cases and how this assessment affected the delivery of governmental services. The data in this collection consist of street-level work stories or narratives, semi-structured entry and exit interviews, and a structured questionnaire. Participants from the aforementioned job categories were drawn from select southwest and midwest United States cities over a period of three years (1996-1999). Part 1 includes the quantitative data from the structured questionnaire. Part 2 includes transcripts of the narratives and interviews. The entry interview was designed to gather background information on the participants and to explain and schedule the story collection process. Participants were queried about their work history, current job, and relations with citizen-clients, coworkers, and supervisors. They were asked to describe their various personal, professional, and group identities and how their social identities related to those of the citizens with whom they interacted. They were also asked to describe any critical incidents in the history of their agency, such as a public scandal or change of administration, that influenced their work environment. At the conclusion of the entry interview, the participants were given instructions and materials for the narratives. The participants were asked to write down a rough outline of two or three different stories describing situations that took place within their agency. These stories were to focus on instances when the participants' perception of "fairness or unfairness" impacted their decision-making in encounters with citizen-clients or with the agency. The narratives were collected during a scheduled meeting between the researcher and participant. The researcher asked the participant to tell his or her stories, which were tape-recorded. During the initial storytelling, the researchers interrupted as little as possible, asking questions at the conclusion to encourage the story teller to fill in missing or unelaborated details. The tape-recorded stories were transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were lightly edited for clarity and to introduce the observations added in response to researcher probes. The exit interview involved a structured questionnaire and a brief open-ended interview. The questionnaire data were not intended to allow for statistical inference but to describe the participants. The questionnaire asked direct questions about discretion and justice as well as a series of standard questions on task authority, task variety, the frequency of work expectations, the applicability and clarity of rules, and the percentage of time spent working directly with citizen-clients. Participants were queried about the adequacy of resources, work load, job satisfaction, and perceptions of fairness at work. They were also asked questions on ideology and political orientation, as well as hypothetical questions regarding the distribution of rules. The exit interview involved three open-ended questions: What the word "justice" meant to participants, whether participants felt there were groups in America that were treated unfairly, and if any of the rules or procedures at work struck participants as unfair.
Table of Contents
- DS0: Study-Level Files
- DS1: Quantitative Questionnaire Data
- DS2: Qualitative Interview and Narrative Data
1996 / 1999Time period: 1996--1999
1996 / 1999Collection date: 1996--1999
The codebook for Part 1 and the qualitative interview data (Part 2) are provided by ICPSR as Portable Document Format (PDF) files. The PDF file format was developed by Adobe Systems Incorporated and can be accessed using PDF reader software, such as the Adobe Acrobat Reader. Information on how to obtain a copy of the Acrobat Reader is provided on the ICPSR Web site.
- 3324 (Type: ICPSR Study Number)
Maynard-Moody, Steven, Musheno, Michael. Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. 2003.
Oberweis, Trish, Musheno, Michael. Cops Identities and the Communicative Aspects of Policing. Between Law and Culture: Relocating Legal Studies.Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. 2001.
Oberweis, Trish, Musheno, Michael C.. Knowing Rights: State Actors' Stories of Power, Identity, and Morality. Burlington, VT: Ashgate. 2001.
Maynard-Moody, Steven, Leland, Suzanne. Stories from the Front-Lines of Public Management: Street-Level Workers as Responsible Actors. Advancing Public Management: New Developments in Theory, Methods, and Practice.Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 2000.
Maynard-Moody, Steven, Musheno, Michael. State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.10, (2), 329-359.2000.
- ID: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024272 (DOI)
Oberweis, Trish, Musheno, Michael. Policing identities: Cop decision making and the constitution of citizens. Law and Social Inquiry.24, (4), 897 -1999.
- ID: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.1999.tb00408.x (DOI)
Update Metadata: 2015-08-05 | Issue Number: 6 | Registration Date: 2015-06-15