My da|ra Login

Detailed view

metadata language: English

National Prosecutors Survey [Census], 2001

Version
v0
Resource Type
Dataset : census/enumeration data
Creator
  • United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
Other Title
  • Archival Version (Subtitle)
Collective Title
  • National Prosecutors Survey Series
Publication Date
2002-07-03
Funding Reference
  • United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
Language
English
Free Keywords
attorneys; case processing; district attorneys; evidence; felony courts; felony offenses; plea negotiations; policies and procedures; prosecuting attorneys; prosecution; sentencing; state courts; trial procedures
Description
  • Abstract

    The National Survey of Prosecutors is a survey of chief prosecutors in state court systems. It was previously conducted in 1990, 1992, 1994, and 1996 (ICPSR 9579, 6273, 6785, 2433 respectively). For 2001, instead of a survey of chief prosecutors, a census of all 2,341 chief prosecutors who handled felony cases in state courts of general jurisdiction was conducted. A chief prosecutor is an official, usually locally elected and typically with the title of district attorney or county attorney, who is in charge of a prosecutorial district made up of one or more counties, and who conducts or supervises the prosecution of felony cases in a state court system. Prosecutors in courts of limited jurisdiction, such as municipal prosecutors, were not included in the survey. The census' purpose was to obtain detailed descriptive information on prosecutors' offices, as well as information on their policies and practices. Variables cover staffing, funding, special categories of felony prosecutions, caseload, juvenile matters, work-related threats or assaults, the use of DNA evidence, and community-related activities, such as involvement in neighborhood associations. The unit of analysis is the district office.
  • Methods

    ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Standardized missing values.; Performed recodes and/or calculated derived variables.; Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes..
  • Table of Contents

    Datasets:

    • DS1: Dataset
Temporal Coverage
  • Time period: 2001
  • 2001-05 / 2001-08
    Collection date: 2001-05--2001-08
Geographic Coverage
  • United States
Sampled Universe
Prosecutorial districts in the United States.
Sampling
inap.
Collection Mode
  • Conducted by the National Opinion Research Center.

Note
2005-11-04 On 2005-03-14 new files were added to one or more datasets. These files included additional setup files as well as one or more of the following: SAS program, SAS transport, SPSS portable, and Stata system files. The metadata record was revised 2005-11-04 to reflect these additions. Funding insitution(s): United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Availability
Delivery
This version of the study is no longer available on the web. If you need to acquire this version of the data, you have to contact ICPSR User Support (help@icpsr.umich.edu).
Alternative Identifiers
  • 3418 (Type: ICPSR Study Number)
Relations
  • Is previous version of
    DOI: 10.3886/ICPSR03418.v1
Publications
  • Giblin, Matthew J.. Understanding Influence Across Justice Agencies: The Spread of 'Community Reforms' from Law Enforcement to Prosecutor Organizations. Final Report.NCJ 245945, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University. 2014.
    • ID: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/245945.pdf (URL)
  • Byers, Bryan D., Warren-Gordon, Kiesha, Jones, James A.. Predictors of hate crime prosecutions: An analysis of data from the National Prosecutors Survey and state-level bias crime laws. Race and Justice.2, (3), 203-219.2012.
    • ID: 10.1177/2153368712446868 (DOI)
  • Haynes, Stacy Hoskins. The effects of victim-related contextual factors on the criminal justice system. Crime and Delinquency.57, (2), 298-328.2011.
    • ID: 10.1177/0011128710372190 (DOI)
  • Owens, Emily G.. Media and the Criminal Justice System. . 2010.
  • King, Ryan D., Messner, Steven F., Baller, Robert D.. Contemporary hate crimes, law enforcement and the legacy of racial violence. American Sociological Review.74, (2), 291-315.2009.
    • ID: 10.1177/000312240907400207 (DOI)
  • Rasmusen, Eric, Raghav, Manu, Ramseyer, Mark. Convictions versus conviction rates: The prosecutor's choice. American Law and Economics Review.11, (1), 47-78.2009.
    • ID: 10.1093/aler/ahp007 (DOI)
  • Buzzell, Timothy. The effects of organizational and community context on local prosecution of computer child pornography cases. Criminal Justice Studies.40, (4), 391-405.2007.
    • ID: 10.1080/14786010701758179 (DOI)
  • Raghav, Manu. Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Issues Concerning the State Prosecutors. Indiana University. 2007.
  • Cunningham, William Scott, Renauer, Brian C., Khalifa, Christy. Sharing the keys to the courthouse: Adoption of community prosecution by state court presecutors. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice.22, (3), 202-219.2006.
    • ID: 10.1177/1043986206292363 (DOI)
  • Raghav, Manu. Why do budgets received by state prosecutors vary across districts in the United States?. CAEPR Working Paper.#2006-018, Indiana University Bloomington, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research. 2006.
  • Baicker, Katherine. The budgetary repercussions of capital convictions. Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy.4, 2004.
    • ID: 10.2202/1538-0637.1311 (DOI)
  • DeFrances, Carol J.. State Court Prosecutors in Small Districts, 2001. NCJ 196020, Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2003.
    • ID: http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/scpsd01.pdf (URL)
  • DeFrances, Carol J.. Prosecutors in State Courts, 2001. NCJ 193441, Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2002.
    • ID: http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/psc01.pdf (URL)
  • DeFrances, Carol J.. State Court Prosecutors in Large Districts, 2001. NCJ 191206, Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2001.
    • ID: http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/scpld01.pdf (URL)
  • Snyder, Howard N., Sickmund, Melissa. Juvenile Offenders and Victims. 1999 National Report.NCJ 178257, Washington, DC: United States Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. 1999.

Update Metadata: 2015-08-05 | Issue Number: 6 | Registration Date: 2015-06-15

United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics (2002): National Prosecutors Survey [Census], 2001. Archival Version. National Prosecutors Survey Series. Version: v0. ICPSR - Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03418