My da|ra Login

Detailed view

metadata language: English

Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences, 2001

Resource Type
Dataset : event/transaction data
  • United States Sentencing Commission
Other Title
  • Archival Version (Subtitle)
Collective Title
  • Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences Series
Publication Date
Funding Reference
  • United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
Free Keywords
convictions (law); criminal histories; defendants; federal courts; judicial decisions; offenses; sentencing; sentencing guidelines
  • Abstract

    This collection contains information on federal criminal cases sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The data files include all cases received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had sentencing dates between October 1, 2000, and September 30, 2001, and were assessed as constitutional. Constitutionality compares each case's sentencing date, circuit, district, and judge to provide uniformity in reporting the cases. In 1999, the United States Sentencing Commission added more variables from its databases to this collection, so the data are now provided in two files. Part 1, Main Data File, includes the most important variables for each case, such as defendant's age, criminal history points, armed criminal status, case disposition, sentence, and fines applied. Part 2, Supplemental Data File, contains additional variables involving multiple guideline computation and count-based statutes. For a more detailed discussion of the two files, users should consult the codebook.
  • Methods

    ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes..
  • Table of Contents


    • DS0: Study-Level Files
    • DS1: Main Data File
    • DS2: Supplemental Data File
Temporal Coverage
  • 2000-10-01 / 2001-09-30
    Time period: 2000-10-01--2001-09-30
  • 2000 / 2001
    Collection date: 2000--2001
Geographic Coverage
  • United States
Sampled Universe
All cases received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had sentencing dates between October 1, 2000, and September 30, 2001, and were assessed as constitutional.
Collection Mode
  • Starting with the 1999 data, ICPSR archives MONITORING OF FEDERAL CRIMINAL SENTENCES under a new study number for each year of data. Data for the years 1993-1998 are archived under study number 9317.

2014-06-25 All parts are being moved from restricted access to public access.2011-04-11 All parts are being moved to restricted access and will be available only using the restricted access procedures.2006-01-18 File CB3497.ALL.PDF was removed from any previous datasets and flagged as a study-level file, so that it will accompany all downloads.2005-01-27 The PDF codebook for all parts was revised. Funding insitution(s): United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
This version of the study is no longer available on the web. If you need to acquire this version of the data, you have to contact ICPSR User Support (
Alternative Identifiers
  • 3497 (Type: ICPSR Study Number)
  • Is previous version of
    DOI: 10.3886/ICPSR03497.v1
  • Doerner, Jill K.. The joint effects of gender and race/ethnicity on sentencing outcomes in federal courts. Women and Criminal Justice.2015.
    • ID: 10.1080/08974454.2014.989298 (DOI)
  • Nutting, Andrew W.. Squealer dealers: The market for information in federal drug trafficking prosecutions. Economic Inquiry.53, (1), 486-507.2015.
    • ID: 10.1111/ecin.12123 (DOI)
  • Albonetti, Celesta A.. Changes in federal sentencing for forced labor trafficking and for sex trafficking: A ten year assessment. Crime, Law and Social Change.61, (2), 179-204.2014.
    • ID: 10.1007/s10611-013-9507-1 (DOI)
  • Doerner, Jill K., Demuth, Stephen. Gender and sentencing in the federal courts: Are women treated more leniently?. Criminal Justice Policy Review.25, (2), 242-269.2014.
    • ID: 10.1177/0887403412466877 (DOI)
  • Light, Michael T., Massoglia, Michael, King, Ryan D.. Citizenship and punishment: The salience of national membership in U.S. criminal courts. American Sociological Review.79, (5), 825-847.2014.
    • ID: 10.1177/0003122414543659 (DOI)
  • Nowacki, Jeffrey. United States v. Booker and Federal Sentencing Outcomes: General, Extra-Legal, and Contextual Policy Effects. Dissertation, University of New Mexico. 2014.
  • Doerner, Jill K.. Gender disparities in sentencing departures: An examination of U.S. federal courts. Women and Criminal Justice.22, (3), 176-205.2012.
    • ID: 10.1080/08974454.2012.687953 (DOI)
  • Fischman, Joshua B., Schanzenbach, Max M.. Racial disparities under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: The role of judicial discretion and mandatory minimums. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies.99, (4), 729-764.2012.
  • Albonetti, Celesta A.. Judicial discretion in federal sentencing . Criminology and Public Policy.10, (4), 1151-1155.2011.
    • ID: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00772.x (DOI)
  • Engen, Rodney. Racial disparity in the wake of 'Booker/Fanfan': Making sense of 'messy' results and other challengers for sentencing research. Criminology and Public Policy.10, (4), 1139-1149.2011.
    • ID: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00773.x (DOI)
  • Farrell, Amy, Ward, Geoff. Examining district variation in sentencing in the Post-Booker Period. Federal Sentencing Reporter.23, (5), 318-325.2011.
    • ID: 10.1525/fsr.2011.23.5.318 (DOI)
  • Hagen, Courtney. Bias in the Federal Judicial System: Do Sentencing Disparities Exist in the Southwest Border Region of the United States?. Thesis, Georgetown University. 2011.
  • Logue, Melissa A.. Downward departures in US federal courts: Do family ties, sex, and race/ethnicity matter?. Ethnic and Racial Studies.34, (4), 683-706.2011.
    • ID: 10.1080/01419870.2010.487568 (DOI)
  • Paternoster, Raymond. Racial disparity under the federal sentencing guidelines pre- and post-'Booker'. Criminology and Public Policy.10, (4), 1073-1076.2011.
    • ID: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00778.x (DOI)
  • Scott, Ryan W.. Race disparity under advisory guidelines. Criminology and Public Policy.10, (4), 1129-1138.2011.
    • ID: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00779.x (DOI)
  • Spohn, Cassia. Unwarranted disparity in the wake of the 'Booker/Fanfan' decision. Criminology and Public Policy.10, (4), 1119-1127.2011.
    • ID: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00768.x (DOI)
  • Ulmer, Jeffery T., Eisenstein, James, Johnson, Brian D.. Trial penalties in Federal sentencing: Extra-guidelines factors and District variations. Justice Quarterly.27, (4), 560-592.2011.
    • ID: 10.1080/07418820902998063 (DOI)
  • Ulmer, Jeffery T., Light, Michael T., Kramer, John H.. Overview of 'Racial disparity in the wake of the 'Booker/Fanfan' decision. Criminology and Public Policy.10, (4), 1073-10752011.
    • ID: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00760.x (DOI)
  • Ulmer, Jeffery T., Light, Michael T., Kramer, John H.. Racial disparity in the wake of the 'Booker/Fanfan' decision: An alternative analysis to the USSC's 2010 report. Criminology and Public Policy.10, (4), 1077-1118.2011.
    • ID: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00761.x (DOI)
  • Doerner, Jill K., Demuth, Stephen. The independent and joint effects of race/ethnicity, gender and age on sentencing outcomes in U. S. Federal courts. Justice Quarterly.27, (1), 1-27.2010.
    • ID: 10.1080/07418820902926197 (DOI)
  • Farrell, Amy, Ward, Geoff, Rousseau, Danielle. Intersections of gender and race in federal sentencing: Examining court contexts and the effects of representative court authorities. Journal of Gender, Race and Justice.14, (1), 85-126.2010.
  • Freeborn, Beth, Hartmann, Monica E.. Judicial discretion and sentencing behavior: Did the Feeney Amendment rein in District judges?. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies.7, (2), 355-378.2010.
    • ID: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01181.x (DOI)
  • Shermer, Lauren O'Neill, Johnson, Brian D.. Criminal prosecutions: Examining prosecutorial discretion and charge reductions in U.S. Federal District Courts. Justice Quarterly.27, (3), 394-430.2010.
    • ID: 10.1080/0748820902856972 (DOI)
  • Clark, James D.. International Defendants in Federal Criminal Court: An Examination of Racial, Ethnic, and Citizenship Status Disparity in Sentencing Outcomes. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin. 2009.
  • Doerner, Jill K.. Explaining the Gender Gap in Sentencing Outcomes: An Investigation of Differential Treatment in U.S. Federal Courts. Dissertation, Bowling Green State University. 2009.
  • Farrell, Amy, Ward, Geoff, Rousseau, Danielle. Race effects of representation among federal court workers: Does Black workforce representation reduce sentencing disparities?. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.623, 121-133.2009.
    • ID: 10.1177/0002716208331128 (DOI)
  • Iles, Gale. The effects of race/ethnicity and national origin on length of sentence in the United States Virgin Islands. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.623, (1), 64-76.2009.
    • ID: 10.1177/0002716208330705 (DOI)
  • Kautt, Paula M.. Is the offense serious axis free of extralegal influence? Assessing the predictors of a 'legally relevant' guideline criterion. American Journal of Criminal Justice.34, (3-4), 253-273.2009.
    • ID: 10.1007/s12103-008-9048-9 (DOI)
  • Tiede, Lydia Brashear. The impact of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and reform: A comparative analysis. Justice System Journal.30, (1), 34-49.2009.
  • Tiede, Lydia Brashear. The swinging pendulum of sentencing reform: Political actors regulating District Court discretion. BYU Journal of Public Law.24, (1), 101-149.2009.
  • Ward, Geoff, Farrell, Amy, Rousseau, Danielle. Does racial balance in workforce representation yield equal justice? Race relations of sentencing in Federal court organizations. Law and Society Review.43, (4), 757-806.2009.
    • ID: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00388.x (DOI)
  • Tiede, Lydia Brashear. The politics of criminal law reform: A comparative analysis of lower court decision-making. NCJ 223283, Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice. 2008.
    • ID: (URL)
  • Ward, Geoff, Farrell, Amy, Rousseau, Danielle. Does Court Workforce Racial Diversity Yield Racial Justice? Some Evidence from Federal Court Contexts. NCJ 221890, Boston, MA: Northeastern University. 2008.
    • ID: (URL)
  • Tiede, Lydia Brashear. Delegating discretion: Quasi experiments on District Court decision making. American Politics Research.35, (5), 595-620.2007.
    • ID: 10.1177/1532673X07299449 (DOI)
  • Iles, Gayle D.. America's Forgotten Paradise: An Assessment of Sentencing Decisions and Outcomes in the United States Virgin Islands. Dissertation, University of Nebraska. 2006.
  • Schanzenbach, Max. Racial and Sex Disparities in Prison Sentences: The Effect of District-level Judicial Demographics. Journal of Legal Studies.34, (1), 57-92.2005.
    • ID: 10.1086/425597 (DOI)
  • Gillespie, William Lee. Constrained Justice: Investigating the Influence of the U.S. Courts of Appeals on District Court Sentencing Behavior. Dissertation, University of Georgia. 2004.
  • Burrow, John D., Koons-Witt, Barbara A.. Elderly status, extraordinary physical impairments and intercircuit variation under the federal sentencing guidelines. Elder Law Journal.11, (2), 273-328.2003.
  • United States Sentencing Commission. 2001 Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics. Washington, DC: United States Sentencing Commission. 2003.

Update Metadata: 2015-08-05 | Issue Number: 6 | Registration Date: 2015-06-15

United States Sentencing Commission (2002): Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences, 2001. Archival Version. Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences Series. Version: v0. ICPSR - Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research. Dataset.