My da|ra Login

Detailed view

metadata language: English

Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: County-Level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data, 2002

Version
v0
Resource Type
Dataset : aggregate data
Creator
  • United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Other Title
  • Archival Version (Subtitle)
Collective Title
  • Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data Series
Publication Date
2004-08-26
Funding Reference
  • United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
Language
English
Free Keywords
aggravated assault; alcohol; arrests; arson; assault; auto theft; burglary; counties; crime rates; crime reporting; crime statistics; drug abuse; embezzlement; fraud; illegal gambling; larceny; law enforcement; murder; offenses; rape; robbery; sex offenses; Uniform Crime Reports; vagrancy; vandalism; weapons offenses
Description
  • Abstract

    This data collection contains county-level counts of arrests and offenses for Part I offenses (murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, auto theft, and arson) and counts of arrests for Part II offenses (forgery, fraud, embezzlement, vandalism, weapons violations, sex offenses, drug and alcohol abuse violations, gambling, vagrancy, curfew violations, and runaways).
  • Methods

    ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Standardized missing values.; Performed recodes and/or calculated derived variables.; Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes..
  • Table of Contents

    Datasets:

    • DS0: Study-Level Files
    • DS1: Arrests, All Ages
    • DS2: Arrests, Adult
    • DS3: Arrests, Juveniles
    • DS4: Crimes Reported
    • DS5: Allocated Statewide Data for Arrests, All Ages
    • DS6: Allocated Statewide Data for Arrests, Adults
    • DS7: Allocated Statewide Data for Arrests, Juveniles
    • DS8: Allocated Statewide Data for Crimes Reported
Temporal Coverage
  • Time period: 2002
  • Collection date: 2002
Geographic Coverage
  • United States
Sampled Universe
County law enforcement agencies in the United States.
Collection Mode
  • Two major changes to the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) county-level files were implemented beginning with the 1994 data. A new imputation algorithm to adjust for incomplete reporting by individual law enforcement jurisdictions was adopted. Within each county, data from agencies reporting 3 to 11 months of information were weighted to yield 12-month equivalents. Data for agencies reporting less than 3 months of data were replaced with data estimated by rates calculated from agencies reporting 12 months of data located in the agency's geographic stratum within its state. Secondly, a new Coverage Indicator was created to provide users with a diagnostic measure of aggregated data quality in a particular county. Data from agencies reporting only statewide figures were allocated to the counties in the state in proportion to each county's share of the state population.

    In the arrest files (Parts 1-3 and 5-7), data were estimated for agencies reporting zero months based on the procedures mentioned above. However, due to the structure of the data received from the FBI, estimations could not be produced for agencies reporting zero months in the crimes reported files (Parts 4 and 8). Offense data for agencies reporting one or two months are estimated using the above procedures. Users are encouraged to refer to the codebook for more information.

    No arrest data were provided for Florida. Limited arrest data were available for Illinois. Limited offense data were available for Illinois, Kentucky, Mississippi, Montana, and South Dakota.

    UCR program staff at the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) were consulted in developing the new adjustment procedures. However, these UCR county-level files are not official FBI UCR releases and are being provided for research purposes only. Users with questions regarding these UCR county-level data files can contact the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data at ICPSR.

    Users should note that there are no records in the data for the borough of Denali, Alaska (FIPS code 02068) in any of the collections of the Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: County-Level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data from 1990 to 2003. The borough of Denali, Alaska (FIPS code 02068) was created from part of the Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area (FIPS code 02290) an unpopulated part of the Southeast Fairbanks Census Area (FIPS code 02240) effective December 7, 1990. Since no agency records for either arrests or crimes reported from Denali were present in any of the original FBI files, no data for the borough of Denali, Alaska appear in any the ICPSR collections for these years.

Note
2006-03-30 File CB4009.ALL.PDF was removed from any previous datasets and flagged as a study-level file, so that it will accompany all downloads.2006-01-16. Miami-Dade county code was changed from 025 to 086 in the data to match the documentation.2005-11-04 On 2005-03-14 new files were added to one or more datasets. These files included additional setup files as well as one or more of the following: SAS program, SAS transport, SPSS portable, and Stata system files. The metadata record was revised 2005-11-04 to reflect these additions. Funding insitution(s): United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Availability
Delivery
This version of the study is no longer available on the web. If you need to acquire this version of the data, you have to contact ICPSR User Support (help@icpsr.umich.edu).
Alternative Identifiers
  • 4009 (Type: ICPSR Study Number)
Relations
  • Is previous version of
    DOI: 10.3886/ICPSR04009.v1
Publications
  • Aneja, Abhay, Donohue, John J., III, Zhang, Alexandria,. The Impact of Right to Carry Laws and the NRC Report: The Latest Lessons for the Empirical Evaluation of Law and Policy. Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 461.. 2014.
  • Brasier, Kathryn, Davis, Lisa, Glenna, Leland, Kelsey, Tim, McLaughlin, Diane, Schafft, Kai, Babbie, Kristin, Biddle, Catherine, Delessio-Parson, Anne, Rhubart, Danielle. The Marcellus Shale Impacts Study: Chronicling Social and Economic Change in North Central and Southwest Pennsylvania. Harrisburg, PA: Center for Rural Pennsylvania. 2014.
    • ID: http://www.rural.palegislature.us/documents/reports/The-Marcellus-Shale-Impacts-Study.pdf (URL)
  • Fan, Jessie X., Wen, Ming, Kowaleski-Jones, Lori. An ecological analysis of environmental correlates of active commuting in urban U.S.. Health and Place.30, 242-250.2014.
    • ID: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.09.014 (DOI)
  • LaRiviere, Jacob S., Wolff, Hendrik. The Power of the Little Blue Pill: Innovations and Implications of Life Style Drugs in an Aging Population. IZA Discussion Paper No. 8261.. 2014.
    • ID: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2460204 (URL)
  • Lattimore, Pamela K., Steffey, Danielle M., Gfroerer, Joseph, Bose, Jonaki, Pemberton, Michael R., Penne, Michael A.. Arrestee Substance Use: Comparison of Estimates from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health and the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program. CBHSQ Data Review.Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. 2014.
    • ID: http://www.samhsa.gov/data/2K14/NSDUHDRADAM/NSDUH-DR-ADAM-2014.pdf (URL)
  • Rincke, Johannes. The effect of crime on regional economic performance: Evidence from U.S. metropolitan areas. . 2014.
    • ID: http://www.wirtschaftspolitik.rw.uni-erlangen.de/RINCKE_Crime_and_Regional_Economic_Performance_July2014.pdf (URL)
  • Wright, Richard, Tekin, Erdal, Topalli, Volkan, McClellan, Chandler, Dickinson, Timothy, Rosenfeld, Richard. Less Cash, Less Crime: Evidence from the Electronic Benefit Transfer Program. 19996, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. 2014.
    • ID: http://www.nber.org/papers/w19996.pdf?new_window=1 (URL)
  • d'Este, Rocco. The Effect of Stolen Goods Markets on Crime: Pawnshops, Property Thefts and the Gold Rush of the 2000s . . 2014.
    • ID: http://ces.univ-paris1.fr/ADRES-2015/DOCTORANT/D%27ESTE/D%27ESTE_paper.pdf (URL)
  • Prelog, Andrew J.. Longitudinal and Geographic Analysis of the Relationship Between Natural Disasters and Crime in the United States. Dissertation, Colorado State University. 2012.
  • Freedman, Matthew, Owens, Emily G.. Low-income housing development and crime. Journal of Urban Economics.70, (2-3), 115-131.2011.
    • ID: 10.1016/j.jue.2011.04.001 (DOI)
  • Schaefer, Shelly S.W.. Blurring the Lines: Blended Sentencing and the Juvenile Justice System. Dissertation, University of Minnesota. 2011.
  • Pacula, Rosalie L., Kilmer, Beau, Grossman, Michael, Chaloupka, Frank J.. Risks and practices: The role of user sanctions in marijuana markets. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy.10, (1), 1-36.2010.
  • Briddell, Laine. Rurality and Crime: Identifying and Explaining Rural/Urban Differences. Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University. 2009.
  • Li, Yuh-Yuh. Social Structure, Social Control, and Crime in Rural Communities: A Test of Social Disorganization Theory. Dissertation, Ohio State University. 2009.
  • Maccoun, Robert, Pacula, Rosalie Liccardo, Chriqui, Jamie, Harris, Katherine, Reuter, Peter. Do citizens know whether their state has decriminalized marijuana? Assessing the perceptual component of deterrence theory. Review of Law and Economics.5, (1), 347-371.2009.
    • ID: 10.2202/1555-5879.1227 (DOI)
  • Lee, Matthew. Civic community in the hinterland: Toward a theory of rural social structure and violence. Criminology.46, (2), 447-478.2008.
    • ID: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00115.x (DOI)
  • Lim, Hyeyoung. Finding Explanations on the Growth of Incarceration and the Reductions in Crime: Incapacity or Social Threat?. Dissertation, Sam Houston State University. 2008.
  • Drug Free Marion County. A Community at Risk . Drug Free Marion County's Snapshot of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drug Use.Indianapolis, IN: Drug Free Marion County. 2007.
  • Pacula, Rosalie Liccardo, Kilmer, Beau, Grossman, Chaloupka, Frank J.. Risks and Prices: The Role of User Sanctions in Marijuana Markets. NBER Working Paper Series.NCJ 13415, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. 2007.
    • ID: http://www.nber.org.proxy.lib.umich.edu/papers/w13415.pdf?new_window=1 (URL)
  • Lee, Matthew R.. The religious institutional base and violent crime in rural areas. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.45, (3), 309-324.2006.
    • ID: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2006.00309.x (DOI)

Update Metadata: 2015-08-05 | Issue Number: 8 | Registration Date: 2015-06-15

United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation (2004): Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: County-Level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data, 2002. Archival Version. Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data Series. Version: v0. ICPSR - Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04009