My da|ra Login

Detailed view

metadata language: English

Census of State and Federal Adult Correctional Facilities, 1990

Resource Type
Dataset : survey data
  • United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
Other Title
  • Version 2 (Subtitle)
Collective Title
  • Census of State and Federal Adult Correctional Facilities Series
Publication Date
Funding Reference
  • United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
Free Keywords
correctional facilities; correctional facilities (adults); corrections management; drug abuse; drug testing; drug treatment; inmate deaths; inmate populations; inmate programs; inmates; jails; prison administration; prison conditions; prison construction; prison overcrowding; prison violence
  • Abstract

    This census is the fourth enumeration of state adult correctional institutions and the first of federal institutions sponsored by the Bureau of Justice Statistics and conducted by the Bureau of the Census. Earlier censuses were completed in 1974 (ICPSR 7811), 1979 (ICPSR 7852), and 1984 (ICPSR 8444). Separate questionnaires were devised for confinement facilities and for community-based facilities. Variables describing the facilities include physical security, age, functions, capacity, confinement space, available medical facilities, programs, inmate/resident work assignments, staff employment, facilities under court order/consent decree for conditions of confinement, capital and operating expenditures, custody level of inmates/residents, one-day count and average daily population, race/ethnicity of inmates/residents, inmate/resident deaths, special inmate/resident counts, and assaults and incidents by inmates. An addendum on drug control activities in state and federal facilities was included for the first time in the 1990 census. Facilities were asked to provide information on the following: procedures used with inmates/residents, visitors, and staff to keep out illegal drugs and drug paraphernalia, inmate/resident drug-testing practices, including the criteria for testing inmates/residents, the number of inmates/residents tested in total and by specific drug, and the number that tested positive, staff drug testing, including groups and basis for testing, number tested, and procedures when tests were positive, and capacity and enrollment in various types of drug treatment and intervention programs.
  • Methods

    ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Performed consistency checks.; Standardized missing values.; Performed recodes and/or calculated derived variables.; Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes..
  • Table of Contents


    • DS0: Study-Level Files
    • DS1: Main Data File
    • DS2: SAS Data Definition Statements
Temporal Coverage
  • Time period: 1990
  • Collection date: 1990
Geographic Coverage
  • United States
Sampled Universe
The facility universe was developed from the Census of State Adult Correctional Facilities conducted in 1984. This list was revised using the 1990 American Correctional Association Directory and information obtained from state correctional administrators and the Federal Bureau of Prisons. The census included prisons, prison farms, reception, diagnostic, and classification centers, road camps, forestry and conservation camps, youthful offender facilities (except in California), vocational training facilities, correctional drug and alcohol treatment facilities, and state-operated local detention facilities in Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
Data were collected from 957 state prison facilities, 250 state community-based facilities, and 80 federal prisons operating on June 29, 1990.
Collection Mode
  • When all prisons in the census did not provide data on particular variables, estimated figures were used where indicated. Total figures were estimated by multiplying the known or reported numbers by the ratio of the total relevant population to the reported population. All figures were estimated independently and total estimates were therefore larger than the sum of all subgroup estimates. The total population figure used in the projections varied, depending upon which figure was most appropriate. The two available population figures are the average daily population and the prison count on the reference day for the census--June 29, 1990. For drug testing, the basis for estimation was the average daily population, and for drug treatment capacity and enrollment, the basis was the one-day count. (2) The codebook is provided by ICPSR as a Portable Document Format (PDF) file. The PDF file format was developed by Adobe Systems Incorporated and can be accessed using PDF reader software, such as the Adobe Acrobat Reader. Information on how to obtain a copy of the Acrobat Reader is provided on the ICPSR Web site.

2001-12-21 The SPSS data definition statements were edited to include a file handle statement, and the codebook was converted to Portable Document Format (PDF). Funding insitution(s): United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
This study is freely available to the general public via web download.
Alternative Identifiers
  • 9908 (Type: ICPSR Study Number)
  • Is new version of
    DOI: 10.3886/ICPSR09908.v1
  • Burkhardt, Brett C., Jones, Alisha. Judicial intervention into prisons: Comparing private and public prisons from 1990 to 2005. Justice System Journal.2015.
    • ID: 10.1080/0098261X.2015.1062738 (DOI)
  • Schlanger, Margo. How prisoners' rights lawyers are preserving the role of the courts. University of Miami Law Review.2015.
  • Schlanger, Margo. Trends in prisoner litigation, as the PLRA enters adulthood. UC Irvine Law Review.2015.
  • Steiner, Benjamin, Wooldredge, John. Implications of different outcome measures for an understanding of inmate misconduct. Crime and Delinquency.59, (8), 1234-1262.2013.
    • ID: 10.1177/0011128709335151 (DOI)
  • Burkhardt, Brett C.. Private Prisons in Public Discourse: Measuring Moral Legitimacy. Politics, Culture and Society Working Papers Series.2012-01, Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. 2012.
    • ID: (URL)
  • Phelps, Michelle S.. The place of punishment: Variation in the provision of inmate services staff across the punitive turn. Journal of Criminal Justice.40, (5), 348-357.2012.
    • ID: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.06.012 (DOI)
  • Phelps, Michelle S.. Rehabilitation in the punitive era: The gap between rhetoric and reality in U.S. prison programs. Law and Society Review.45, (1), 33-68.2011.
    • ID: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00427.x (DOI)
  • Wilson, David M.. Crime, Punishment and Institutions. Dissertation, Clemson University. 2011.
  • Patterson, Evelyn J.. Incarcerating death: Mortality in U.S. State correctional facilities, 1985-1998. Demography.47, (3), 587-607.2010.
    • ID: 10.1353/dem.0.0123 (DOI)
  • Patterson, Evelyn J.. Measurement issues in corrections: Quality and compatibility of state correctional data in the United States, 1984-2000. Corrections Compendium.35, (3), 1-13.2010.
  • Klein, Steven, Tolbert, Michelle. Correctional education: Getting the data we need. Journal of Correctional Education.58, (3), 284-292.2007.
  • Patterson, Evelyn J.D.. A Demography of Incarceration: An Analysis of Measurement and Mortality in United States' State Correctional Facilities, 1985-1998. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. 2007.
  • Richards, Nicole. Detailing Changes in State Prisons, 1974-2000, and Explaining Social Unrest as a Function of Social Structure, Institutional Characteristics, and Political Context. Dissertation, Pennsylvania State University. 2007.
  • Kinney, Nancy T.. The implications for inmate rights of the voluntary provision of religious services. Criminal Justice Policy Review.17, (2), 188-201.2006.
    • ID: 10.1177/0887403405280943 (DOI)
  • Noble, Rosevelt L.. Black Rage in the American Prison System. New York, NY: LFB Scholarly Publishing. 2006.
  • Useem, Bert, Piehl, Anne M.. Prison buildup and disorder. Punishment and Society.8, (1), 87-115.2006.
    • ID: 10.1177/1462474506059141 (DOI)
  • Franklin, Cortney A., Fearn, Noelle E., Franklin, Travis W.. HIV/AIDS among female prison inmates: A public health concern. Californian Journal of Health Promotion.3, (2), 99-112.2005.
    • ID: (URL)
  • Huey, Meredith P., Mcnulty, Thomas L.. Institutional conditions and prison suicide: Conditional effects of deprivation and overcrowding. Prison Journal.85, (4), 490-514.2005.
    • ID: 10.1177/0032885505282258 (DOI)
  • Maggard, Scott R., Parker, Karen F.. Structural Theories and Race-Specific Drug Arrests: What Structural Factors Account for the Rise in Race-Specific Drug Arrests Over Time?. Crime and Delinquency.51, (4), 521-547.2005.
  • Klein, Steven, Tolbert, Michelle, Bugarin, Rosio, Cataldi, Emily Forrest, Tauscheck, Gina. Correctional Education: Assessing the Status of Prison Programs and Information Needs. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education, Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools. 2004.
    • ID: (URL)
  • Parker, Karen F.. Industrial Shift, Polarized Labor Markets and Urban Violence: Modeling the Dynamics Betweenthe Economic Transformation and Disaggregated Homicide. Criminology.42, (3), 619-645.2004.
    • ID: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00531.x (DOI)
  • Schlanger, Margo. Inmate litigation. Harvard Law Review.116, (6), 1555-1706.2003.
    • ID: (URL)
  • Parker, Karen. Gender, Economic Transformation and Urban Health. NCJ 198659, Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice. 2002.
    • ID: (URL)
  • Parker, Karen F.. A move toward specificity: Examining urban disadvantage and race- and relationship-specific homicide rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology.17, (1), 89-110.2001.
    • ID: 10.1023/A:1007578516197 (DOI)
  • Stana, Richard M.. State and Federal Prisoners: Profiles of Inmate Characteristics in 1991 and 1997. Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office. 2000.
  • Schlanger, Margo. Beyond the hero judge: institutional reform litigation as litigation. Michigan Law Review.97, (6), 1994-2036.1999.
    • ID: (URL)
  • Useem, Bert, Reisig, Michael D.. Collective action in prisons: Protests, disturbances, and riots. Criminology.37, (4), 735-759.1999.
    • ID: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00503.x (DOI)
  • Bonczar, Thomas P., Beck, Allen J.. Lifetime Likelihood of Going to State or Federal Prison, Special Report. NCJ 160092, United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. 1997.
    • ID: (URL)
  • Dobrin, Adam, Wiersma, Brian, Loftin, Colin, McDowall, David. Statistical Handbook on Violence in America. Phoenix: Oryx Press. 1996.
  • McCorkle, Richard C., Miethe, Terance D., Drass, Kriss A.. The roots of prison violence: A test of the deprivation, management, and 'not-so-total' institutional models. Crime and Delinquency.41, (3), 317-331.1995.
    • ID: 10.1177/0011128795041003003 (DOI)
  • Blumstein, Alfred. Racial disproportionality of U.S. prison populations revisited. University of Colorado Law Review.64, (3), 743-760.1993.
  • Harlow, Caroline Wolf. Drug enforcement and treatment in prisons, 1990, Special Report. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. 1992.
  • Stephan, James. Census of State And Federal Correctional Facilities, 1990. NCJ 137003, Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. 1992.
    • ID: (URL)

Update Metadata: 2015-08-05 | Issue Number: 6 | Registration Date: 2015-06-15

United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics (1993): Census of State and Federal Adult Correctional Facilities, 1990. Version 2. Census of State and Federal Adult Correctional Facilities Series. Version: v2. ICPSR - Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research. Dataset.