My da|ra Login

Detailed view

metadata language: English

Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN): Provision of Social Relations (Primary Caregiver), Wave 1, 1994-1995

Version
v0
Resource Type
Dataset : survey data
Creator
  • Earls, Felton J. (Harvard Medical School)
  • Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne (Scientific Director. Columbia University. Teacher's College. Center for the Study of Children and Families)
  • Raudenbush, Stephen W. (Scientific Director. University of Michigan. School of Education and Survey Research Center)
  • Sampson, Robert J. (Scientific Director. Harvard University. Department of Sociology)
Other Title
  • Archival Version (Subtitle)
Collective Title
  • Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) Series
Publication Date
2005-07-18
Funding Reference
  • United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • United States Department of Education. Office of Educational Research and Improvement
  • United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice
  • United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Mental Health
  • Turner Foundation
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  • United States Department of Health and Human Services. Administration for Children and Families. Child Care Bureau
  • Harris Foundation
  • United States Department of Health and Human Services. Administration for Children and Families. Head Start Bureau
Language
English
Free Keywords
adolescents; caregivers; child development; childhood; emotional support; families; family relationships; friendships; interpersonal relations; loneliness; neighborhoods; parents; perceptions; self concept; siblings; social behavior; social identity; social networks; social support; trust (psychology)
Description
  • Abstract

    The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics, that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge various aspects of human development, including individual differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. One such measure was the Provision of Social Relations (Primary Caregiver), or PSRP. The PSRP was an interview administered to the primary caregivers (PC) of the subjects belonging to Cohorts 0 to 18 to evaluate the social support received by the PC from family and friends.
  • Abstract

    Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. It was designed to advance the understanding of the developmental pathways of both positive and negative human social behaviors. In particular, the project examined the causes and pathways of juvenile delinquency, adult crime, substance abuse, and violence. At the same time, the project provided a detailed look at the environments in which these social behaviors took place by collecting substantial amounts of data about urban Chicago, including its people, institutions, and resources. Longitudinal Cohort Study One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics, that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial behaviors. The age cohorts include birth (0), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 years. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge various aspects of human development, including individual differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. Provision of Social Relations (Primary Caregiver) The data in this collection are from Wave 1 of the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was administered between 1994 and 1997. The data files contain information from the Provision of Social Relations (Primary Caregiver) protocol. The Provision of Social Relations (Primary Caregiver), is primarily an evaluation of the primary caregiver's (PC) relationships with his or her family members and friends in order to evaluate the level and nature of the social support received by the PC. Of particular importance was trying to determine the closeness of relationships between the PC and their family and friends. The PSRP also sought to find out who were the PC's primary sources of help and support.
  • Abstract

    Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods The city of Chicago was selected as the research site for the PHDCN because of its extensive racial, ethnic, and social-class diversity. The project collapsed 847 census tracts in the city of Chicago into 343 neighborhood clusters (NCs) based upon seven groupings of racial/ethnic composition and three levels of socioeconomic status. The NCs were designed to be ecologically meaningful. They were composed of geographically contiguous census tracts and geographic boundaries, and knowledge of Chicago's neighborhoods were considered in the definition of the NCs. Each NC was comprised of approximately 8,000 people. Longitudinal Cohort Study For the Longitudinal Cohort Study, a stratified probability sample of 80 neighborhoods was selected. The 80 NCs were sampled from the 21 strata (seven racial/ethnic groups by three socioeconomic levels) with the goal of representing the 21 cells as equally as possible to eliminate the confounding between racial/ethnic mix and socioeconomic status. Once the 80 NCs were chosen, then block groups were selected at random within each of the sample neighborhoods. A complete listing of dwelling units was collected for all sampled block groups. Pregnant women, children, and young adults in seven age cohorts (birth, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 years) were identified through in-person screening of approximately 40,000 dwelling units within the 80 NCs. The screening response rate was 80 percent. Children within six months of the birthday that qualified them for the sample were selected for inclusion in the Longitudinal Cohort Study. A total of 8,347 participants were identified through the screening. Of the eligible study participants, 6,228 were interviewed. For all cohorts except 0 and 18, primary caregivers as well as the child were interviewed. The primary caregiver was the person found to spend the most time taking care of the child. Separate research assistants administered the primary caregiver interviews and the child interviews. The primary method of data collection was face-to-face interviewing, although participants who refused to complete the personal interview were administered a phone interview. Interviews were conducted in Spanish, English, and Polish. In Wave 1 the complete protocol was translated into Spanish and Polish. An interpreter was hired for participants who spoke a language other than English, Spanish, or Polish. Depending on the age and wave of data collection, participants were paid between $5 and $20 per interview. Other incentives, such as free passes to museums, the aquarium, and monthly drawing prizes were also included. Interview protocols included a wide range of questions. For example, some questions assessed impulse control and sensation-seeking traits, cognitive and language development, leisure activities, delinquency and substance abuse, friends' activities, and self-perception, attitudes, and values. Caregivers were also interviewed about family structure, parent characteristics, parent-child relationships, parent discipline styles, family mental health, and family history of criminal behavior and drug use. Provision of Social Relations (Primary Caregiver) The Provision of Social Relations (Primary Caregiver) was an instrument designed to assess the support received by the primary caregivers (PC) of the subjects belonging to Cohorts 0 to 18. The PSRP interview asked specific questions regarding the respondent's primary source of help, sense of closeness to family members and friends, and the presence or absence of feelings of loneliness. The response format for all but three of the questions in the PSRP was 1 = very true, 2 = somewhat true, 3 = not true. For the questions asking the respondent to specify their relationship to the person or persons who helped them the most, the response format was 1 = immediate family, 2 = extended family, 3 = friend or neighbor, 4 = church member/leader, 5 = school or community member/leader, and 6 = other. For these questions the respondent was permitted to give multiple responses.
  • Abstract

    The majority of the variables belonging to the Provision of Social Relations (Primary Caregiver) dataset contained the responses to the questions appearing in the PSRP interview. Additionally, the data contained administrative variables to record identification numbers for respondents and interviewers, cohort, and wave as well as the time and date that the PSRP interview was completed.
  • Methods

    ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Performed recodes and/or calculated derived variables.; Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes..
  • Methods

    Response Rates: The overall response rate for Wave 1 of the Longitudinal Cohort Study was 75 percent or 6,228 participants. The response rates by cohort were: 76.2 percent (1,269) for Cohort 0; 76.6 percent (1,003) for Cohort 3; 75.0 percent (980) for Cohort 6; 75.9 percent (828) for Cohort 9; 74.3 percent (820) for Cohort 12; 71.6 percent (696) for Cohort 15; 70.3 percent (632) for Cohort 18;
  • Table of Contents

    Datasets:

    • DS0: Study-Level Files
    • DS1: Cohort 0
    • DS2: Cohort 3
    • DS3: Cohort 6
    • DS4: Cohort 9
    • DS5: Cohort 12
    • DS6: Cohort 15
Temporal Coverage
  • 1994 / 1997
    Time period: 1994--1997
  • 1994 / 1997
    Collection date: 1994--1997
Geographic Coverage
  • Chicago
  • Illinois
  • United States
Sampled Universe
Children, adolescents, young adults, and their primary caregivers, living in the city of Chicago in 1994.
Sampling
Stratified probability sample.
Collection Mode
  • face-to-face interview, telephone interview

    The Murray Research Center conducted the initial data and documentation processing for this collection.

    At present, only a restricted version of the data is available (see RESTRICTIONS field). A downloadable version of the data is slated to be available in the near future.

Note
2006-03-01 Data were moved to restricted access. The metadata record was changed accordingly. Funding insitution(s): United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. United States Department of Education. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice (93-IJ-CX-K005). United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Mental Health. Turner Foundation. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Administration for Children and Families. Child Care Bureau. Harris Foundation. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Administration for Children and Families. Head Start Bureau.
Availability
Delivery
One or more files in this study are not available for download due to special restrictions; consult the study documentation to learn more on how to obtain the data.
Alternative Identifiers
  • 13597 (Type: ICPSR Study Number)
Relations
  • Is previous version of
    DOI: 10.3886/ICPSR13597.v1
Publications
  • Jackson, Aubrey L.. Influences of Women's Individual and Neighborhood Resources on Relative Risks of Dissolution and Subsequent IPV. Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology.Chicago, IL. 2013.
  • Jackson, Aubrey L.. Three Essays on the Protective Effects of Women's Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Resources on Intimate Partner Violence and Perceptions of Social Disorder. Dissertation, Ohio State University. 2013.
  • Kingston, Sharon. Economic adversity and depressive symptoms in mothers: Do marital status and perceived social support matter?. American Journal of Community Psychology.52, (3-4), 359-366.2013.
    • ID: 10.1007/s10464-013-9601-7 (DOI)
  • Zimmerman, Gregory M., Farrell, Amy S.. Gender differences in the effects of parental underestimation of youths' secondary exposure to community violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence.42, (10), 1512-1527.2013.
    • ID: 10.1007/s10964-012-9897-x (DOI)
  • Almeida, Joanna, Subramanian, S.V., Kawachi, I, Molnar, B.E.. Is blood thicker than water? Social support, depression and the modifying role of ethnicity/nativity status. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.65, 51-56.2011.
    • ID: 10.1136/jech.2009.092213 (DOI)
  • Frank, Reanne, Bjornstrom, Eileen. A tale of two cities: Residential context and risky behavior among adolescents in Los Angeles and Chicago. Health and Place.17, (1), 67-77.2011.
    • ID: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.08.017 (DOI)
  • Gonzales, Gerald G.. Predicting Adolescent Resilient Outcomes for Children Who Experienced Interparental Violence During Childhood. Dissertation, University of Oregon. 2011.
  • Gibson, Chris L., Sullivan, Christopher J., Jones, Shayne, Piquero, Alex R.. 'Does it take a village?' Assessing neighborhood influences on children's self-control. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency.47, (1), 31-62.2010.
    • ID: 10.1177/0022427809348903 (DOI)
  • Zimmerman, Gregory M.. Impulsivity, Offending, and the Neighborhood: Investigating the Person-Context Nexus. Dissertation, State University of New York, Albany. 2009.
  • Burchinal, Margaret, Nelson, Lauren, Carlson, Mary, Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne. Neighborhood characteristics, and child care type and quality. Early Education and Development.19, (5), 702-725.2008.
    • ID: 10.1080/10409280802375273 (DOI)
  • Wodarski, John, Mapson, Andridia V.. A differential analysis of criminal behavior among African-American and Caucasian female juvenile delinquents. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment.18, (2), 224-239.2008.
    • ID: 10.1080/10911350802293478 (DOI)
  • Leventhal, Tama. The EC-HOME across five national data sets in the 3rd to 5th year of life. Parenting.4, (2-3), 161-188.2004.
    • ID: 10.1207/s15327922par0402&3_4 (DOI)

Update Metadata: 2015-08-05 | Issue Number: 6 | Registration Date: 2015-06-16

Earls, Felton J.; Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne; Raudenbush, Stephen W.; Sampson, Robert J. (2005): Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN): Provision of Social Relations (Primary Caregiver), Wave 1, 1994-1995. Archival Version. Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) Series. Version: v0. ICPSR - Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13597