My da|ra Login

Detailed view

metadata language: English

Citizenship, Democracy, and Drug-Related Violence (CIDENA, 2011)

Version
v1
Resource Type
Dataset : survey data
Creator
  • Collective for Security Analysis with Democracy A.C.
  • Universidad Panamericana (Mexico). IPADE Business School. Center for the Study of Institutional Governance
  • Sistemas de Inteligencia en Mercados y Opinión (Mexico)
Other Title
  • Version 1 (Subtitle)
Publication Date
2013-10-23
Funding Reference
  • United States Agency for International Development
Language
English
Free Keywords
crime; drugs; national elections; political affiliation; reactions to crime; security; social attitudes; victimization; violence; voter attitudes; voting behavior
Description
  • Abstract

    The survey Citizenship, Democracy, and Drug-Related Violence (CIDENA, 2011) was implemented with the goal of providing information towards understanding the complex relationship between society and drug-related violence in Mexico. Cognitive interviews, face-to-face interviews, and list experiments were utilized in Mexico. The survey was conducted in face-to-face interviews (at the residence of the interviewee) based on a sample of men and women over 18 years of age and residents of Mexico. The sample was representative nationwide of 7 states with different levels of violence: High (Chihuahua, Guerrero, Michoacán, and Nuevo León), Intermediate (Jalisco, and Estado de México), and Low (Distrito Federal). These states were selected according to their violence indexes (deaths associated with drug related violence reported in local newspapers). Demographic variables include age, sex, marital status, occupation, party affiliation, territories of residence, education, and income.
  • Abstract

    To gather public opinion on drug-related violence in states of Mexico, perceptions of the national economy and political behavior, and social capital through face-to-face interviews.
  • Abstract

    The public opinion survey consisted of 7,416 interviews based on a probabilistic sample design. The survey was implemented in areas with high, intermediate, and low levels of local violence. The survey was conducted by face-to-face interviews (at the residence of the interviewee) based on a sample men and women over 18 years of age and residents of Mexico. In Mexico face-to-face interviews are necessary because both telephone and internet have a very low rate of penetration.
  • Methods

    Considering the methodology used for the sampling design of the study data weights were elaborated. These weights consider the probability of selection according to the sampling frame distributions by state, age, and gender. Due to these considerations the following weight correctors were established. The estimators weight observations by the inverse estimate of the selection probability. See Appendix: Weight Section of the Codebook for more information.
  • Methods

    ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Performed consistency checks.; Created variable labels and/or value labels.; Standardized missing values.; Created online analysis version with question text.; Performed recodes and/or calculated derived variables.; Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes..
  • Methods

    Presence of Common Scales: list experiments
  • Methods

    Response Rates: The overall non-response rate was 8 percent. The survey had a response time between 20 to 45 minutes.
  • Table of Contents

    Datasets:

    • DS1: Dataset
Temporal Coverage
  • Time period: 2011
  • Collection date: 2011
Geographic Coverage
  • Chihuahua
  • Distrito Federal (Mexico)
  • Estado de México
  • Guerrero
  • Jalisco
  • Mexico
  • Michoacán
  • Nuevo León
Sampled Universe
Men and women over 18 years of age and residents of Mexico to date of survey Smallest Geographic Unit: State
Sampling
The sample design was based on a list of 64,934 electoral sections defined by the Federal Election Institute for 2011. The selection procedure was a complex, stratified and PPS random sampling design over electoral sections sampling framework (nominal listing 2011). It was a complex selection procedure due to the various stages; the first stage stratified the electoral sections by state. This stage was needed for the oversampling of the selected states. In the second stage 75 electoral sections were selected for: Chihuahua, Distrito Federal, Estado de México, Jalisco, Michoacán, and Nuevo León, 68 for Guerrero, and 100 for the other 25 states with Probability Proportional to Size (PPS) sampling design. The results of this survey at a national level are accurate at the 95 percent confidence level plus or minus 1.1 percentage point. The sampling error for each state: (1) Chihuahua, Distrito Federal, Estado de México, Jalisco, Michoacán, and Nuevo León: accurate at the 95 percent confidence level +/- 3.3 percent, (2) Guerrero: accurate at the 95 percent confidence level +/- 3.5 percent.
Collection Mode
  • cognitive assessment test, face-to-face interview

Note
Funding insitution(s): United States Agency for International Development (4935-012-11-008).
Availability
Download
This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions via web download.
Alternative Identifiers
  • 34670 (Type: ICPSR Study Number)

Update Metadata: 2015-08-05 | Issue Number: 6 | Registration Date: 2015-06-16

Collective for Security Analysis with Democracy A.C.; Universidad Panamericana (Mexico). IPADE Business School. Center for the Study of Institutional Governance; Sistemas de Inteligencia en Mercados y Opinión (Mexico) (2013): Citizenship, Democracy, and Drug-Related Violence (CIDENA, 2011). Version 1. Version: v1. ICPSR - Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34670.v1