My da|ra Login

Detailed view

metadata language: English

Afrobarometer Round 5: The Quality of Democracy and Governance in Burundi, 2012

Version
v0
Resource Type
Dataset : survey data
Creator
  • Sebudandi, Christophe (Groupe de Recherche et d'Appui au Développement des Initiatives Démocratiques)
  • Gyimah-Boadi, E. (Ghana Center for Democratic Development)
  • Bratton, Michael (Michigan State University)
  • Mattes, Robert (Institute for Democracy in South Africa)
  • Logan, Carolyn (Michigan State University)
  • Dulani, Boniface (University of Malawi)
Other Title
  • Archival Version (Subtitle)
Collective Title
  • Afrobarometer Survey Series
Publication Date
2015-06-02
Funding Reference
  • Department for International Development (United Kingdom)
  • Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency
  • Mo Ibrahim Foundation
  • World Bank
  • United States Agency for International Development
Language
English
Free Keywords
corruption; democracy; economic conditions; gender; government; government performance; information sources; legislatures; living conditions; national interests; police; political attitudes; political participation; presidential performance; presidents; public confidence; public opinion; quality of life; social attitudes; social services; standard of living; taxes; trust in government
Description
  • Abstract

    The Afrobarometer project was designed to collect and disseminate information regarding Africans' views on democracy, governance, economic reform, civil society, and quality of life. This particular data collection was concerned with the attitudes and opinions of the citizens of Burundi. Respondents in a face-to-face interview were asked to rate their president and the president's administration in overall performance, to state the most important issues facing their nation, and to evaluate the effectiveness of certain continental and international institutions. Opinions were gathered on the role of the government in improving the economy, whether corruption existed in local and national government, whether government officials were responsive to problems of the general population, and whether local government officials, the police, the courts, the overall criminal justice system, and the National Electoral Commission could be trusted. Additionally respondents were polled about their political involvement and opinions on controversial topics. Economic questions addressed the past, present, and future of the country's and the respondents' living conditions. Background variables include age, gender, ethnicity, education, religious affiliation, language spoken most at home, whether the respondent was the head of the household, current and past employment status, and language used in interview. In addition, the interviewer's gender, race, and education level is provided.
  • Methods

    The data are not weighted, however, this collection contains the weight variable WITHINWT, that should be used in any analysis. This weight was created to account for individual selection probabilities. For additional information on the weights, please visit the Afrobarometer Web site.
  • Methods

    ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Standardized missing values.; Created online analysis version with question text.; Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes..
  • Methods

    Response Rates: 69.8 percent
  • Table of Contents

    Datasets:

    • DS1: Afrobarometer Round 5: The Quality of Democracy and Governance in Burundi, 2012
Temporal Coverage
  • 2012-11-28 / 2012-12-10
    Time period: 2012-11-28--2012-12-10
  • 2012-11-28 / 2012-12-10
    Collection date: 2012-11-28--2012-12-10
Geographic Coverage
  • Africa
  • Burundi
  • Global
Sampled Universe
Citizens of Burundi aged 18 years or older. Smallest Geographic Unit: Region
Sampling
The Afrobarometer uses a clustered, stratified, multi-stage, area probability sample design. The sample is designed as a representative cross-section of all citizens of voting age in a given country. The goal is to give every adult citizen an equal and known chance of selection for interview. This objective is reached by (a) strictly applying random selection methods at every stage of sampling and by (b) applying sampling with probability proportionate to population size wherever possible. A randomly selected sample of 1,200 cases allows inferences to national adult populations with a margin of sampling error of no more than plus or minus 3 percent with a confidence level of 95 percent. If the sample size is increased to 2,400, the confidence interval shrinks to plus or minus 2 percent.
Collection Mode
  • face-to-face interview, paper and pencil interview (PAPI)

    The Original P.I. Documentation and the Data Collection Instrument were provided in French and the data contain foreign language characters.

    Additional information on the Afrobarometer Survey can be found by visiting the Afrobarometer Web site.

Availability
Delivery
This version of the study is no longer available on the web. If you need to acquire this version of the data, you have to contact ICPSR User Support (help@icpsr.umich.edu).
Alternative Identifiers
  • 35545 (Type: ICPSR Study Number)
Relations
  • Is previous version of
    DOI: 10.3886/ICPSR35545.v1

Update Metadata: 2015-08-05 | Issue Number: 6 | Registration Date: 2015-06-16

Sebudandi, Christophe; Gyimah-Boadi, E.; Bratton, Michael; Mattes, Robert; Logan, Carolyn et. al. (2015): Afrobarometer Round 5: The Quality of Democracy and Governance in Burundi, 2012. Archival Version. Afrobarometer Survey Series. Version: v0. ICPSR - Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35545