My da|ra Login

Detailed view

metadata language: English

Homeland Security in Small Law Enforcement Jurisdictions: Preparedness, Efficacy, and Proximity to Big-City Peers, 2011

Version
v1
Resource Type
Dataset : survey data
Creator
  • Schafer, Joseph A. (Southern Illinois University)
  • Giblin, Matthew J. (Southern Illinois University)
  • Burruss, George W. (Southern Illinois University)
  • Haynes, Melissa R. (Southern Illinois University)
Other Title
  • Version 1 (Subtitle)
Publication Date
2015-12-22
Funding Reference
  • United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice
Language
English
Free Keywords
disasters; emergencies; emergency preparedness; law enforcement; national security; perceptions; public safety; risk; security; terrorism; terrorist attacks
Description
  • Abstract

    The Homeland Security in Small Law Enforcement Jurisdictions study drew upon data collected from 350 small (1-25 full time sworn officers) law enforcement agencies nationwide to address four gaps in the homeland security research literature and clarify/expand upon an empirically-derived model of homeland security preparedness and organizational efficacy. Whether physical and relational proximity to large agency peers facilitates the development of homeland security preparedness and improves perceptions of organizational efficacy (the capacity of an organization to respond) in small agencies and, conversely, whether the geographic isolation of small, rural agencies inhibits homeland security efforts.; Whether efficacy of efforts to enhance homeland security is not just a function of perceived/actual risk or funding, but also other "institutional pressures", such as books and journal publications, as well as conferences, training, and other professional networks and channels.; Assessments of preparedness outcomes through "organizational efficacy", the perception about the organization's ability to accomplish its goals.; The lack of theoretical context, such as contingency and institutional theory frameworks, used to examine data on preparedness and organizational efficacy.;
  • Abstract

    The purpose of this study was to examine the capacity of small law enforcement organizations to prevent and respond to terrorist attacks.
  • Abstract

    Surveys were mailed to the chief executive (e.g., chief, commissioner, director of public safety, chief marshal, officer-in-charge) of each agency using the mailing address contained within the census database. The name of each agency's chief executive was identified through web sources and the most recent version of the National Directory of Law Enforcement Administrators, Correctional institutions, and Related Agencies (National Public Safety Information Bureau, 2011). The survey was accompanied by a cover letter describing the purpose of the study, human subject protections, and instructions for completing and returning the survey, as well as a postage paid envelope. Although the survey was mailed to the agency's leader, in some cases it was completed by an individual other than the intended recipient. Nearly one of five (19.1 percent) of surveys were returned completed by someone other than the chief, commissioner, chief marshal, officer-in-charge, or other title denoting chief executive status in the organization. The survey was administered in three mailings, with each wave intended to increase the response rate. The first wave of 810 surveys was mailed on March 10, 2011. Approximately 20 percent of respondents returned surveys by the time of the second mailing on April 7. The second wave produced an additional 10 percent response rate. A third and final mailing, sent May 3, generated a total response rate of slightly over 38 percent. A final attempt was made to contact each non-responding agency in June 2011 in order to encourage participation. A member of the project team attempted to phone each of the roughly 500 non-responding agencies at least once, yielding an increase in the response rate of 7 percent. Overall, 350 agencies returned surveys for a realized response rate of 44.5 percent.
  • Abstract

    The dataset contains a total of 93 variables. The survey contained items covering topics such as preparedness, efficacy, risk, resource dependence, and institutional forces. In order to measure the influence of physical and relational proximity, respondents were asked a series of questions about their relationships and interactions with their nearest large municipal police department peer.
  • Methods

    None
  • Methods

    ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Created variable labels and/or value labels.; Standardized missing values.; Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes..
  • Methods

    Presence of Common Scales: Several Likert-type scales were used.
  • Methods

    Response Rates: 350 agencies responded to a survey sent out to 786 agencies in the sample (44.5 percent response rate).
  • Table of Contents

    Datasets:

    • DS1: Homeland Security Survey
Temporal Coverage
  • Time period: 2011
  • Collection date: 2011
Geographic Coverage
  • United States
Sampled Universe
Municipal law enforcement agencies employing between 1 and 25 full-time officers as enumerated by the 2004 iteration of the BJS Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies (formerly the Directory of Law Enforcement Agencies). Smallest Geographic Unit: Municipality
Sampling
Small municipal police departments (employing between 1 and 25 full time officers) were extracted from the 2004 BJS Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies and stratified according to geographic location using the U.S. Department of Agriculture rural-urban continuum codes. Agencies no longer in operation at the time of the study were removed, resulting in an adjusted sample of 786 agencies.
Collection Mode
  • mail questionnaire

Note
Funding insitution(s): United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice (2010-IJ-CX-0024).
Availability
Download
One or more files in this study are not available for download due to special restrictions; consult the study documentation to learn more on how to obtain the data.
Alternative Identifiers
  • 33941 (Type: ICPSR Study Number)
Publications
  • Giblin, Matthew J., Burruss, George W., Schafer, Joseph A.. A stone's throw from the metropolis: Re-examining small-agency homeland security practices. Justice Quarterly.31, (2), 368-393.2014.
    • ID: 10.1080/07418825.2012.662993 (DOI)
  • Haynes, Melissa R., Giblin, Matthew J.. Homeland security risk and preparedness in police agencies: The insignificance of actual risk factors. Police Quarterly.17, (1), 30-53.2014.
    • ID: 10.1177/1098611114526017 (DOI)
  • Burruss, George W., Schafer, Joseph A., Giblin, Matthew J., Haynes, Melissa R.. Homeland Security in Small Law Enforcement Agencies: Preparedness and Proximity to Big-City Peers. NCJ 239466, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois State University Carbondale, Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice. 2012.
    • ID: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/239466.pdf (URL)

Update Metadata: 2015-12-22 | Issue Number: 2 | Registration Date: 2015-12-22

Schafer, Joseph A.; Giblin, Matthew J.; Burruss, George W.; Haynes, Melissa R. (2015): Homeland Security in Small Law Enforcement Jurisdictions: Preparedness, Efficacy, and Proximity to Big-City Peers, 2011. Version 1. Version: v1. ICPSR - Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33941.v1