My da|ra Login

Detailed view

metadata language: German English

Eurobarometer 62.2 (Nov-Dec 2004)

Version
1.1.0
Resource Type
Dataset : Survey and aggregate data
Creator
  • Europäische Kommission
Other Title
  • Agricultural Policy, Development Aid and Social Capital (Subtitle)
Publication Date
2012-03-30
Contributor
  • European Commission, Brussels; DG Communication Public Opinion Analysis Sector (Researcher)
  • Österreichisches GALLUP, Vienna, Austria TNS Dimarso, Bruxelles, Belgium TNS GALLUP DK, Copenhagen, Denmark TNS Sofres, Montrouge, France TNS GALLUP OY, Espoo, Finland TNS Infratest, Munich, Germany TNS ICAP, Athens, Greece TNS UK, London, United K (Data Collector)
Language
English
Classification
  • ZA:
    • International Institutions, Relations, Conditions
    • Branches of Economy, Services and Transport
    • Work and Industry
    • Society, Culture
  • CESSDA Topic Classification:
    • Social behaviour and attitudes
    • International politics and organisation
    • Mass political behaviour, attitudes/opinion
    • Government, political systems and organisation
    • Rural economics
    • Economic systems and development
Description
  • Abstract

    This round of Eurobarometer surveys queried respondents on the standard Eurobarometer measures as well as agricultural policy, development aid, social capital, and information and communication technology. Topics: To start the interview, standard trend questions were asked regarding support for membership of the European Union, trust in three specific institutions (the Parliament, the Commission, and the Council), support for the European Constitution, and the international political situation. Next, questions were asked regarding agriculture policy. Respondents gave their views on the role of the agriculture policy of the European Union (EU), whether the policy was playing its role well or badly, and whether the EU should subsidize agricultural products or grant more funds to the overall rural economy and to direct support for farmers. The third portion of the interview collected information on respondents´ views on development aid. Questions were asked pertaining to the importance of helping people in impoverished countries, providing aid to those countries, how much of the nation´s and the European Commission´s budget should be spent on aid to other countries, whether the respondent had heard about the Millennium Development Goals, and which three actions would be the most important for their government to undertake in order to help developing countries achieve the Millennium Development Goals. Another major focus of the survey was social capital. A series of questions addressed satisfaction with life, the importance of different aspects of life, personal networks, political and social commitment, and discrimination experience. The last topic of the survey was information and communication technology at the workplace. Respondents were asked what technological devices were most prevalent in their daily lives (both professional and personal), to what extent they made use of computers and the Internet, whether they had received information and communication technology training, and whether they were able to telecommute (telework). Demography: Respondent´s age, gender, nationality, origin of birth (personal and parental), marital status, left-to-right political self-placement, occupation, age when they stopped full-time education, household composition, and region.
Temporal Coverage
  • 2004-11-27 / 2004-12-19
    France
  • 2004-12-01 / 2004-12-19
    Belgium
  • 2004-11-22 / 2004-12-15
    Netherlands
  • 2004-11-26 / 2004-12-14
    Germany
  • 2004-12-02 / 2004-12-19
    Italy
  • 2004-11-25 / 2004-12-16
    Luxembourg
  • 2004-11-29 / 2004-12-19
    Denmark
  • 2004-11-26 / 2004-12-19
    Ireland (Republic)
  • 2004-11-26 / 2004-12-19
    Great Britain
  • 2004-11-26 / 2004-12-19
    Northern Ireland
  • 2004-11-27 / 2004-12-18
    Greece
  • 2004-11-24 / 2004-12-18
    Spain
  • 2004-12-01 / 2004-12-19
    Portugal
  • 2004-11-26 / 2004-12-19
    Finland
  • 2004-11-24 / 2004-12-14
    Sweden
  • 2004-11-30 / 2004-12-19
    Austria
  • 2004-12-01 / 2004-12-17
    Cyprus (Republic)
  • 2004-11-26 / 2004-12-13
    Czech Republic
  • 2004-12-01 / 2004-12-17
    Estonia
  • 2004-11-25 / 2004-12-18
    Hungary
  • 2004-11-27 / 2004-12-19
    Latvia
  • 2004-11-27 / 2004-12-15
    Lithuania
  • 2004-11-24 / 2004-12-16
    Malta
  • 2004-11-29 / 2004-12-17
    Poland
  • 2004-11-26 / 2004-12-17
    Slovakia
  • 2004-11-29 / 2004-12-19
    Slovenia
  • 2004-11-24 / 2004-12-12
    Bulgaria
  • 2004-12-02 / 2004-12-13
    Romania
Geographic Coverage
  • France (FR)
  • Belgium (BE)
  • Netherlands (NL)
  • Germany (DE)
  • Italy (IT)
  • Luxembourg (LU)
  • Denmark (DK)
  • Ireland (IE)
  • Great Britain (GB-GBN)
  • Northern Ireland (GB-NIR)
  • Greece (GR)
  • Spain (ES)
  • Portugal (PT)
  • Finland (FI)
  • Sweden (SE)
  • Austria (AT)
  • Cyprus (CY)
  • Czech Republic (CZ)
  • Estonia (EE)
  • Hungary (HU)
  • Latvia (LV)
  • Lithuania (LT)
  • Malta (MT)
  • Poland (PL)
  • Slovakia (SK)
  • Slovenia (SI)
  • Bulgaria (BG)
  • Romania (RO)
Sampled Universe
All respondents were residents in the respective country and aged 15 and over.
Sampling
Sampling Procedure Comment: A multi-stage, random (probability) sampling design was used for this Eurobarometer. In the first stage, primary sampling units (PSU) were selected from each of the administrative regionals units in every country (Statistical Office of the European Community, EUROSTAT NUTS 2 or equivalent). PSU selection was systematic with probability proportional to population size, from sampling frames stratified by the degree of urbanization. In the next stage, a cluster of starting addresses was selected from each sampled PSU, at random. Further addresses were chosen systematically using standard random route procedures as every Nth address from th initial address. In each household, a respondent was drawn, at random, following the closest birthday rule. No more than one interview was conducted in each household. They were supposed to have sufficient command of one of the respective national language(s) to answer the questionnaire. Separate samples were drawn for Northern Ireland and East Germany.
Collection Mode
  • Face-to-face interviews with standardized questionnaire. As far as the data capture is concerned, CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview) was used in those countries where this technique was available.
Data and File Information
  • Unit Type: Individual
    Number of Units: 27008
    Number of Variables: 578
Note
The regular sample size (in the sense of completed interviews) is 1000 respondents per country, except the United Kingdom with separate samples for Great Britain (1000) and Northern Ireland (300), Germany with separate samples for the Eastern (500) and the Western part (1000), and Luxembourg, Cyprus (Republic), and Malta with 500 interviews each. Effective number of realised interviews in this round: France 1004, Belgium 1011, Netherlands 1016, Germany-West 1001, Germany-East 532, Italy 1005, Luxembourg 510, Denmark 1011, Ireland 1000, Great Britain 1059, Northern Ireland 307, Greece 1000, Spain 1045, Portugal 1000, Finland 1028, Sweden 1009, Austria 1030, Cyprus (Republic) 500, Czech Republic 1120, Estonia 1000, Hungary 1000, Latvia 1000, Lithuania 1004, Malta 500, Poland 1000, Slovakia 1307, Slovenia 1000, Bulgaria 1009, and Romania 1000. The topical module ´information technology´(QE1 to QE12) was only surveyed in Bulgaria and Romania. In the EU member countries identical questions were asked in the framework of Eurobarometer 62.1. The topical modules ´Common Agricultural Policy´ (QB1 to QB4) and ´development aid´(QC1 to QC13) were not surveyed in Bulgaria and Romania.
Availability
Download
0 - Data and documents are released for everybody.
Rights
All metadata from GESIS DBK are available free of restriction under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. However, GESIS requests that you actively acknowledge and give attribution to all metadata sources, such as the data providers and any data aggregators, including GESIS. For further information see https://dbk.gesis.org/dbksearch/guidelines.asp
Alternative Identifiers
  • ZA4231 (Type: ZA-No.)
  • doi:10.3886/ICPSR04668.v2 (Type: DOI)
  • Internationale Umfrageprogramme (Type: FDZ)
Relations
  • Is new version of
    DOI: 10.4232/1.4231
Publications
  • TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 220 / Wave 62.2. Barometric questions. Survey requested and coordinated by the Directorate General Press and Communication (European Commission). Brussels: February 2005. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_220_en.pdf
  • TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 221 / Wave 62.2. Europeans and the Common Agricultural Policy. Survey requested by Directorate General Agriculture and coordinated by the Directorate General Press and Communication (European Commission). Brussels: February 2005. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_221_en.pdf
  • TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 222 / Wave 62.2. Attitudes towards Development Aid. Survey requested by Directorate General Development and coordinated by the Directorate General Press and Communication (European Commission). Brussels. February 2005. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_222_en.pdf
  • TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 223 / Wave 62.2. Social Capital. Survey requested by Directorate General Employment and Social Affairs and coordinated by the Directorate General Press and Communication (European Commission). Brussels: February 2005. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_223_en.pdf

Update Metadata: 2020-10-21 | Issue Number: 92 | Registration Date: 2012-05-16

Europäische Kommission (2012): Eurobarometer 62.2 (Nov-Dec 2004). Agricultural Policy, Development Aid and Social Capital. Version: 1.1.0. GESIS Data Archive. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.10964