My da|ra Login

Detailed view

metadata language: German English

Flash Eurobarometer 236 (Citizens´ perceptions of fraud and the fight against fraud in the EU27)

Version
1.0.0
Resource Type
Dataset : Survey and aggregate data
Creator
  • Europäische Kommission
Publication Date
2009
Contributor
  • Papacostas, Antonis (European Commission, Brussels DG Communication Public Opinion Analysis) (Researcher)
  • GALLUP EUROPE, Brussels, Belgium (Data Collector)
  • FOCUS AGENCY, Prague, Czech Republic (Data Collector)
  • HERMELIN, Copenhagen, Denmark (Data Collector)
  • IFAK, Taunusstein, Germany (Data Collector)
  • SAAR POLL, Tallinn, Estonia (Data Collector)
  • METRON ANALYSIS, Athens, Greece (Data Collector)
  • GALLUP SPAIN, Spain (Data Collector)
  • EFFICIENCE3, Reims, France (Data Collector)
  • GALLUP UK, London, United Kingdom (Data Collector)
  • CYMAR, Nikosia, Cyprus (Data Collector)
  • DEMOSKOPEA, Rome, Italy (Data Collector)
  • LATVIAN FACTS, Latvia (Data Collector)
  • BALTIC SURVEY, Vilnius, Lithuania (Data Collector)
  • GALLUP EUROPE, Luxembourg, Luxembourg (Data Collector)
  • GALLUP HUNGARY, Budapest, Hungary (Data Collector)
  • MISCO, Valletta, Malta (Data Collector)
  • TELDER, Al Leusten, Netherlands (Data Collector)
  • SPECTRA, Linz, Austria (Data Collector)
  • GALLUP POLAND, Warsaw, Poland (Data Collector)
  • CONSULMARK, Lisbon, Portugal (Data Collector)
  • VALICON, Ljubljana, Slovenia (Data Collector)
  • FOCUS AGENCY, Bratislava, Slovakia (Data Collector)
  • HERMELIN, Norrköping, Sweden (Data Collector)
  • HERMELIN, Pori, FinlandVITOSHA, Sofia, Bulgaria (Data Collector)
  • GALLUP ROMANIA, Bucharest, RomaniaThe GALLUP Organisation, Brussels / The GALLUP Organisation, Hungary(international co-ordination) (Data Collector)
Language
English
Classification
  • CESSDA Topic Classification:
    • Crime
    • International politics and organisation
Description
  • Abstract

    Attitudes towards measures of fighting fraud within the EU. Topics: assessment of the extent of the following practices: defrauding national state budget, defrauding EU budget, corruption in national government and institutions, corruption in European Union institutions, corruption in international organisations; attitude towards the following statements on defrauding the EU budget: own country should cooperate more with anti-fraud services of EU institutions, own country should cooperate more with anti-fraud services of other EU member states, EU should coordinate national investigations of defrauding the EU budget, EU needs own EU level anti-fraud organisation; awareness of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF); trust in selected institutions with regard to fighting fraud against the European Union budget: national police, national customs services, national tax authorities, national legal system, OLAF, other European bodies, press and media, national state auditors, private auditing firms in the own country, national anti-corruption body; own experience with bribery in the last twelve months; involved person: police officer, customs officer, tax officer, judge, inspector, politician, European institutions’ official, private business, other; preferred source of information on fraud against the EU budget. Demography: sex; age; age at end of education; occupation; professional position; type of community. Additionally coded was: respondent ID; interviewer ID; language of the interview; country; date of interview; time of the beginning of the interview; duration of the interview; type of phone line; region; weighting factor.
Temporal Coverage
  • 2008-06-26 / 2008-06-30
Geographic Coverage
  • Belgium (BE)
  • Denmark (DK)
  • Germany (DE)
  • Spain (ES)
  • Greece (GR)
  • France (FR)
  • Ireland (IE)
  • Italy (IT)
  • Luxembourg (LU)
  • Netherlands (NL)
  • Austria (AT)
  • Portugal (PT)
  • Finland (FI)
  • Sweden (SE)
  • United Kingdom (GB)
  • Czech Republic (CZ)
  • Estonia (EE)
  • Cyprus (CY)
  • Lithuania (LT)
  • Latvia (LV)
  • Hungary (HU)
  • Malta (MT)
  • Poland (PL)
  • Slovenia (SI)
  • Slovakia (SK)
  • Bulgaria (BG)
  • Romania (RO)
Sampled Universe
Population aged 15 years and over
Collection Mode
  • Face-to-face interview
  • Telephone interview: CATI
  • Telephone interviews were conducted in each country with the exception of Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary Poland, Romania, and Slovakia where both telephone and face-to-face interviews were conducted (70% webCATI and 30% F2F interviews).
Data and File Information
  • Unit Type: Individual
    Number of Units: 25770
    Number of Variables: 68
Availability
Download
0 - Data and documents are released for everybody.
Rights
All metadata from GESIS DBK are available free of restriction under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. However, GESIS requests that you actively acknowledge and give attribution to all metadata sources, such as the data providers and any data aggregators, including GESIS. For further information see https://dbk.gesis.org/dbksearch/guidelines.asp
Alternative Identifiers
  • ZA4879 (Type: ZA-No.)
  • Internationale Umfrageprogramme (Type: FDZ)
Publications
  • European Commission; The Gallup Organization: Citizens’ perceptions of fraud and the fight against fraud in the EU27 Brussels: European Commission October 2008 http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_236_en.pdf

Update Metadata: 2020-10-21 | Issue Number: 89 | Registration Date: 2010-07-22

Europäische Kommission (2009): Flash Eurobarometer 236 (Citizens´ perceptions of fraud and the fight against fraud in the EU27). Version: 1.0.0. GESIS Data Archive. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.4879