My da|ra Login

Detailed view

metadata language: English

Assessment of Financial Judgment: Conceptual and Measurement Approaches, Metro Detroit, Michigan, 2014-2016

Version
v1
Resource Type
Dataset : observational data, survey data
Creator
  • Lichtenberg, Peter A.
Other Title
  • Version 1 (Subtitle)
Publication Date
2018-12-19
Publication Place
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Publisher
  • Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research
Funding Reference
  • United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice
Language
English
Free Keywords
Schema: ICPSR
assessment; decision making; dementia; elder abuse; exploitation; financial abuse; financial exploitation
Description
  • Abstract

    These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they were received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except for the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompanying readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collection and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed. Drawing on the principles of Whole Person Dementia Assessment (Mast, 2011) and Appelbaum and Grisso's (1988) decision-making model, this project developed a tool, the Lichtenberg Financial Decision Rating Scale (LFDRS). The conceptual model for the LFDRS questionnaire integrates the measurement of contextual variables with financial capacity assessment. The purpose of the study was to establish reliability and validity of the LFDRS and to collect data on normative financial decision-making by older adults. The researchers posited that as financial exploitation of older adults increases, investigation and prosecution of these cases remains difficult for criminal justice professionals who must balance protection of older adults with their right to autonomy; and that both under and over-protection of older adults can lead to damaging consequences. The project goal was to develop a set of new financial decision-making screening and comprehensive measures for criminal justice professionals and non-criminal justice professionals to aid in detecting and prosecuting financial exploitation of older adults. The LFDRS (described above) is meant to be used by mental health professionals, specially trained in assessment of older adults. In addition, the researchers developed a 10-item screening tool, the Lichtenberg Financial Decision Screening Scale or Short Scale (LFDSS), that was tested by multiple professionals working in diverse settings (e.g., APS workers, elder law attorneys, law enforcement personnel). Family members are another group that are often aware of an older adult's vulnerability to financial exploitation and therefore, the researchers developed the Lichtenberg Financial Decision Rating Scale -- Family and Friends version (LFDRS - Family and Friends also known as the LFDRS Informant) to allow concerned professionals to interview confidantes of older adults to help measure financial capacity of a loved one. This tool may be particularly useful for Adult Protective Services to interview multiple people regarding their concerns about an older adult. The collection contains 3 SPSS data files: LFDRS-Data-for-ICPSR.sav (200 cases, 109 variables); LFDRS_Informant-Data-for-ICPSR.sav (150 cases, 45 variables); LFDSS_Screener-Data-for-ICPSR.sav (213 cases, 24 variables);
  • Abstract

    The purpose of the study was to establish reliability and validity of the Lichtenberg Financial Decision Rating Scale (LFDRS) and to collect data on normative financial decision-making by older adults. In research preliminary to this grant (2011-13 prior to NIJ funding) the researchers did the following: Created a new conceptual model for financial decisional abilities; Developed a set of three new financial decision making tools; a 10-item screening measure, a 68-item comprehensive measure and a 13-item measure for key informants, and; Conducted preliminary testing of the comprehensive measure; The purpose of the NIJ grant was to establish the essential psychometric characteristics of our tools, including reliability, validity, and generalizability. Specifically, in these three project years, they proposed to do the following: Collect large amounts of data in order to ensure reliability, validity, generalizability of the three new decisional ability measures; Assess efficiency and usefulness of the screening measure and its implementation into criminal justice investigations, and; Examine how neurocognitive performance measures correlate with the new decisional ability measures;
  • Methods

    Lichtenberg Financial Decision Rating Scale (LFDRS) Participant Recruitment Procedures: A convenience sample of 200 independent functioning and community dwelling older adults was recruited. Inclusion criteria were being age 60 or older, living independently in the community, reporting the ability to be independent in independent activities of daily life and activities of daily life, being a native English speaker, and having the ability to do some basic word reading. After receiving approval from the Institutional Review Board, three methods were used to recruit participants. First, more than 100 participants were directly recruited from the Healthier Black Elders Participant Registry, which is part of the University of Michigan-Wayne State University NIA P30 Resource Center for Minority Aging Research. This required additional approval from the Healthier Black Elders Community Advisory Board (see Hall et al., 2016, for details on recruitment and retention of registry members). Second, the first author gave a number of presentations to groups of older adults across a wide variety of locations and settings, and participants were recruited at these events. And third, a snowballing technique was used. When older adults were approached to participate in the study, either by phone or in person, they were asked to participate in an interview and a cognitive and financial testing session that would last approximately 2 hours. Financial decisions were considered significant if they fell into one of the following categories: (a) investment planning (retirement, insurance, portfolio balancing); (b) estate planning (changes in a will or beneficiaries, allowing someone access to a bank/investment account); (c) major purchase (home, car, renovations, etc.); or (d) giving a gift. Lichtenberg Financial Decision Screening Scale or Short Scale (LFDSS) De-identified anonymous data from 213 cases gathered from a variety of professionals was gathered to analyze the validity and reliability of the LFDSS and analyzed for validity and reliability (see publication list). Adults age 60 or older were eligible for the study if they were making, or had made in the previous 6 months, a significant financial decision (or group of related decisions; e.g., multiple gifts to the same person) and if they were being interviewed by an APS worker or other professional trained in administration of the LFDSS. After gaining the older adult's permission, the APS worker or other professional proceeded to collect the LFDSS information through an interview. There was no overlap of participants between APS and non-APS cases. Non-APS professionals administering the scale included elder law attorneys, financial planners, certified public accountants, social workers, and physicians. For all participants, age, education, and gender were collected, but personal or identifying information was not. Because the data were anonymous, the Wayne State University Institutional Review Board issued a concurrence of exemption. Although written informed consent was not required, the individuals being assessed received an information sheet that included the elements of a consent form. Lichtenberg Financial Decision Rating Scale - Family and Friends (LFDRS-FF) The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of a new informant-report scale of financial decision-making ability, the FF. This informant-report scale was adapted from the Rating Scale, which was administered as a structured interview with multiple-choice response options to assess decisional abilities for a significant financial transaction. Data from 150 family or friends of older adults who were knowledgeable regarding the financial decision of an older adult was gathered via telephone interviews.
  • Methods

    There are 3 data files included in this study. LFDRS-Data-for-ICPSR.sav (200 cases, 109 variables) This dataset includes demographic variables, contextual variables (financial situational awareness, psychological vulnerability, susceptibility to undue influence and financial exploitation), and a financial capacity assessment (the ability to communicate, understand, appreciate and provide rationale for a major financial decision). LFDRS_Informant-Data-for-ICPSR.sav (150 cases, 45 variables) This dataset includes variables on demographics, financial decisions, memory, and relationships. LFDSS_Screener-Data-for-ICPSR.sav (213 cases, 24 variables) This dataset includes variables on demographics and financial decisions and their effects.
  • Methods

    Presence of Common Scales: Scales used include Wide Range Achievement Test 4-reading (WRAT IV-reading), Animal Naming, Bilateral Task-Oriented Training (BTOT), Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), Boston Naming (short version), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Trails A and B, Stroop, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), and Independent Living Scales (money management subtest). The researchers developed the Lichtenberg Financial Decision Rating Scale (LFDRS) questionnaire, which integrates the measurement of contextual variables with financial capacity assessment. Please see the accompanying study documentation for the questionnaire and the study's website for more information.
  • Methods

    Response Rates: Not available
  • Abstract

    Datasets:

    • DS1: Dataset
Temporal Coverage
  • Time period: 2014--2016
  • 2014 / 2016
  • Collection date: 2014-01-30--2016-02-26
  • 2014-01-30 / 2016-02-26
Geographic Coverage
  • Detroit
  • Michigan
  • United States
Sampled Universe
Elders age 60+ community-dwelling, independent in activities of daily living (ADLs), native English speakers, who have recently made or are making a major financial decision. Professionals who interact with older adults who are considering or are making a major financial decision (e.g., Adult Protective Services personnel, elder law attorneys, financial planners, law enforcement professionals). Family members and close friends who are privy to an older adult who has recently made or is making a major financial decision. Smallest Geographic Unit: None
Sampling
For the Lichtenberg Financial Decision Rating Scale (LFDRS) and Lichtenberg Financial Decision Rating Scale - Family and Friends (LFDRS-FF) surveys This was a convenience sample recruited in three ways. First, approximately half the sample was directly recruited from the Healthier Black Elders Participant Registry, which is part of the University of Michigan-Wayne State University NIA P30 Resource Center for Minority Aging Research. Second, the PI gave a number of presentations to groups of older adults across a wide variety of locations and settings (e.g. senior centers, churches, independent living centers), and participants were recruited at these events. And third, a snowballing technique was used. Lichtenberg Financial Decision Screening Scale or Short Scale (LFDSS) data For complete description of methods, refer to: Peter A. Lichtenberg, Katja Ocepek-Welikson, Lisa J Ficker, Evan Gross, Analise Rahman-Filipiak and Jeanne A. Teresi (2017): Conceptual and Empirical Approaches to Financial Decision-making by Older Adults: Results from a Financial Decision-making Rating Scale, Clinical Gerontologist, DOI: 10.1080/07317115.2017.1367748
Collection Mode
  • cognitive assessment test
  • face-to-face interview
  • paper and pencil interview (PAPI)
  • on-site questionnaire
Note
Funding institution(s): United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice (2014-MU-CX-0001).
Availability
Delivery
One or more files in this study are not available for download due to special restrictions; consult the study documentation to learn more on how to obtain the data.
Alternative Identifiers
  • 37130 (Type: ICPSR Study Number)
Publications
  • Lichtenberg, Peter A.. Integrating Improved Assessments of Financial Judgment: Conceptual and Measurement Advance. NCJ 252134, . 2018.
    • ID: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/252134.pdf (URL)

Update Metadata: 2018-12-19 | Issue Number: 2 | Registration Date: 2018-12-19

Lichtenberg, Peter A. (2018): Assessment of Financial Judgment: Conceptual and Measurement Approaches, Metro Detroit, Michigan, 2014-2016. Version 1. Version: v1. ICPSR - Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37130.v1