Replication data for: Do Employers Use Unemployment as a Sorting Criterion When Hiring? Evidence from a Field Experiment
- Eriksson, Stefan
- Rooth, Dan-Olof
AbstractThe stigma associated with long-term unemployment spells could create large inefficiencies in labor markets. While the existing literature points toward large stigma effects, it has proven difficult to estimate causal relationships. Using data from a field experiment, we find that long-term unemployment spells in the past do not matter for employers' hiring decisions, suggesting that subsequent work experience eliminate this negative signal. Nor do employers treat contemporary short-term unemployment spells differently, suggesting that they understand that worker/firm matching takes time. However, employers attach a negative value to contemporary unemployment spells lasting at least nine months, providing evidence of stigma effects.
Is supplement to
DOI: 10.1257/aer.104.3.1014 (Text)
Eriksson, Stefan, and Dan-Olof Rooth. “Do Employers Use Unemployment as a Sorting Criterion When Hiring? Evidence from a Field Experiment.” American Economic Review 104, no. 3 (March 2014): 1014–39. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.3.1014.
- ID: 10.1257/aer.104.3.1014 (DOI)
Update Metadata: 2020-05-18 | Issue Number: 2 | Registration Date: 2019-10-12