Replication data for: Intermediation Reduces Punishment (and Reward)
- Coffman, Lucas C.
AbstractThis paper shows moral decision making is not well predicted by the overall fairness of an act but rather by the fairness of the consequences that follow directly. In laboratory experiments, third-party punishment for keeping money from a poorer player decreases when an intermediary actor is included in the transaction. This is true for completely passive intermediaries, even though intermediation decreases the payout of the poorest player and hurts equity, and because intermediation distances the transgressor from the outcome. A separate study shows rewards of charitable giving decrease when the saliency of an intermediary is increased. (JEL A13, D63, D64)
Is supplement to
DOI: 10.1257/mic.3.4.77 (Text)
Coffman, Lucas C. “Intermediation Reduces Punishment (and Reward).” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 3, no. 4 (November 2011): 77–106. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.3.4.77.
- ID: 10.1257/mic.3.4.77 (DOI)
Update Metadata: 2020-05-18 | Issue Number: 2 | Registration Date: 2019-10-13