My da|ra Login

Detailed view

metadata language: German English

Performance Evaluation in Appointment Procedures. The Changing Tradition of Hiring Professors in Academia. Qualitative Inquiry of the DZHW Study LiBerTas 2016

Version
1.0.0
Resource Type
Dataset : Qualitative, non-standard or low-standard data material
Creator
  • Kleimann, Bernd
  • Klawitter, Maren
  • In der Smitten, Susanne
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung (DZHW)
Publication Date
2019-11-11
Contributor
  • FDZ des DZHW (Distributor)
Funding Reference
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)
Free Keywords
higher education research
Description
  • Abstract

    Based on an analysis of maximally contrasting cases (institutions of higher education, subjects) it was examined how the change in appointment procedures affects the relation of the participating actors and their enactment of institutional logics. For this purpose, eight universities and four Universities of Applied Sciences (UAS) with different profiles were selected originally. The analysis is concentrated on the subjects sociology/social sciences (university + UAS), engineering (university + UAS), physics (university) and medicine (university) in order to cover subject-specific differences (concerning tasks, work processes, endowment of the professorship, disciplinary performance standards, etc.). A total of 76 guideline-based expert interviews were conducted with university heads, deans, chairpersons of appointments committees, equal opportunities commissioners of selected institutions of higher education. The respective requirements, experiences with and assessment of appointment procedures were in the focus. This sample was reduced to the status group of chairpersons of appointments committees. For further information on the sample rationale and data editing method please consult the data methods report.
Temporal Coverage
  • 2015-04-30 / 2016-05-30
    Performance Evaluation in Appointment Procedures. Qualitative Inquiry of the DZHW Study LiBerTas 2016
Geographic Coverage
  • Germany (DE)
Sampled Universe
  • Performance Evaluation in Appointment Procedures. Qualitative Inquiry of the DZHW Study LiBerTas 2016: Persons who were, until 2016, involved in at least one appointment procedure as chairpersons of appointments committees at German universities or Universities of Applied Sciences with public sponsorship.
Sampling
Non-probability Sample: Purposive Sample
Time Dimension
  • Cross-section
Collection Mode
  • Face-to-face interview
    Performance Evaluation in Appointment Procedures. Qualitative Inquiry of the DZHW Study LiBerTas 2016: Interview Guideline-based expert interviews
Data and File Information
  • Unit Type: Individual
    Number of Units: 9
    Number of Variables: 0
    • File Name: Berufungskommissionsvorsitzende
Availability
Delivery
Application necessary under https://metadata.fdz.dzhw.eu/#!/en/studies/stu-lib2016$?version=1.0.0
Alternative Identifiers
  • 1 (Type: VerbundFDB)

Update Metadata: 2019-11-11 | Issue Number: 9 | Registration Date: 2019-10-24

Kleimann, Bernd; Klawitter, Maren; In der Smitten, Susanne; Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung (DZHW) (2019): Leistungsbewertung in Berufungsverfahren. Traditionswandel in der akademischen Personalselektion. Qualitative Erhebung der DZHW-Studie LiBerTas 2016. Version: 1.0.0. Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung (DZHW). Dataset. https://doi.org/10.21249/DZHW:lib2016:1.0.0